Skip navigation

U.S. v. Baggett, No. 96-50492 (9th Cir.) (125 F.3d 1319) (September 29, 1997) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)

Case explains differences between the Victim & Witness Protection Act and the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996.

Case held that restitution orders under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act do not require consideration of defendant's economic circumstances.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login