Skip navigation

Norton v. Dimazana, No. 96-40912 (5th Cir.) (122 F.3d 286) (September 22, 1997) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

Among the notable holdings in this case was a conclusion that "The fee provisions of the PLRA, in a sense, level the playing field between incarcerated I.f.p. litigants and other litigants in the federal courts." (Id., at 291).

Case held that the filing fee provisions of the PLRA do not ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login