Skip navigation

Norton v. Dimazana, No. 96-40912 (5th Cir.) (122 F.3d 286) (September 22, 1997) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

Among the notable holdings in this case was a conclusion that "The fee provisions of the PLRA, in a sense, level the playing field between incarcerated I.f.p. litigants and other litigants in the federal courts." (Id., at 291).

Case held that the filing fee provisions of the PLRA do not …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login