Skip navigation

U.S. v. Gottesman, No. 96-1674, No. 1505 (2nd Cir.) (122 F.3d 150) (September 3, 1997) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)

This decision raises an important restitution issue that is often overlooked, in part because of the erroneous belief that objections about restitution should be deferred until the defendant is released from prison and in part because trial counsel is often unprepared to deal with the ever-changing intricacies of the restitution ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login