Skip navigation

U.S. v. Melius, No. 97-1237 (8th Cir.) (123 F.3d 1134) (September 9, 1997) (Judge Gary A. Fenner)

Retrial following mistrial based on "manifest necessity".

This case is noted because it explores one of the great loopholes in Double Jeopardy jurisprudence - the slippery and elusive concept of "manifest necessity." Midway through a drug trial, the district court (Judge Rosenbaum) declared a mistrial because it was learned that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login