Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rizzo, No. 96-2002 (1st Cir.) (121 F.3d 794) (August 11, 1997) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)

Here, the Court rejected the defense argument that the amount of loss should not include the alleged "losses" attributable to checks that were deposited with a Government shell corporation in a sting operation. His argument was that no loss was capable of occurring as a matter of law; and in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login