Skip navigation

U.S. v. Chavez, No. 96-20622 (5th Cir.) (119 F.3d 342) (August 4, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court held that although the temporal remoteness of extrinsic evidence introduced to show intent weakens its probative value, the age of a prior conviction has never been held to be a per se bar to its use under Rule 404.

In his electrifying book about the American Criminal ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login