Skip navigation

U.S. v. Grover, No. 96-1329 (10th Cir.) (119 F.3d 850) (July 21, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)

In this case, the Court ruled that the defendant was not entitled to the return of his property despite the Government's failure to commence any forfeiture proceedings, since the defendant had already signed a Forfeiture Agreement relinquishing any possessory claim to the property in question.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login