Skip navigation

U.S. v. Roberts, No. 96-1933 (1st Cir.) (119 F.3d 1006) (July 24, 1997) (Judge Robert E. Keeton)

The prosecutor in this case was really cute. With brazenly insincere coquettishness, he kept reminding the jury of the very things that it should not consider when it retired to reach a verdict. He played with the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights by repeatedly commenting on the defendant's failure to testify ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login