Skip navigation

U.S. v. Trigg, No. 96-1487 (7th Cir.) (119 F.3d 493) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)

Here, the Court rejected a claim that the district court had improperly delegated too much discretion to the Probation Officerto set a schedule for the payment of restitution. The Court did acknowledge that "the fixing of restitution payments is a judicial act" (id., at 500); and that "a court abdicates ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login