Skip navigation

Ramirez v. Hatcher, No. 96-16209 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1209) (January 27, 1998) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)

Never underestimate the power of the courts to obfuscate the obvious. In their perpetual quest for
linguistic perfection in what jurors should and should not be told about their duties and responsibilities,
there is probably no more esoteric and pedantic judicial debate than the frequent discussions about the
meaning of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login