U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 675) (March 6, 1998) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on April 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
April 06, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
On this rehearing, the court divided; but Judge Noonan wrote that when a § 2255 motion is brought to vacate a sentence that is illegal by virtue of a later Supreme Court ruling, the Government cannot treat that motion as a breach of the plea bargain.
"Now it is contended ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Dyer, No. 96-30545 (5th Cir.) (136 F.3d 417) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
- U.S. v. Sheinbaum, No. 97-41055 (5th Cir.) (136 F.3d 443) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Avellino, No. 97-1117, No. 309 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 249) (January 30, 1998) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Cassiliano, No. 97-1215 (2nd Cir.) (137 F.3d 742) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Brito, No. 96-50757 (5th Cir.) (136 F.3d 397) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
- U.S. v. Ortiz, No. 96-3123 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 161) (February 24, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Cassiliano, No. 97-1215 (2nd Cir.) (137 F.3d 742) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Carnes, No. 97-80053 (E.D.Mich.) (987 F.Supp. 551) (December 8, 1997) (Judge Gerald E. Rosen)
- U.S. v. Marroquin, No. 97-1653 (1st Cir.) (136 F.3d 220) (February 17, 1998) (Judge Levin H. Campbell)
- U.S. v. Page, No. 96-4083 (6th Cir.) (136 F.3d 481) (February 12, 1998) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez De Varon, No. 96-5421 (11th Cir.) (136 F.3d 740) (March 3, 1998) (Judge John C. Godbold)
- Paradise v. CCI Warden, No. 97-2291, No. 744 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 331) (February 11, 1998) (Judge Charles L. Brieant)
- Thomas v. Superintendent/Woodbourne Corr. Facility, No. 97-3578 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 227) (November 21, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 675) (March 6, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 97-30199 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 653) (February 17, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- In Re US Currency, $844,520.00, No. 97-2210 (8th Cir.) (136 F.3d 581) (February 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Bakeas, No. CRIM. 96-10184-NG (D.Mass.) (987 F.Supp. 44) (November 14, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Ortiz, No. 96-3123 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 161) (February 24, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Ortiz, No. 96-3123 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 161) (February 24, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Toms, No. 97-3047 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 176) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Patricia M. Wald)
- U.S. v. Toms, No. 97-3047 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 176) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Patricia M. Wald)
- U.S. v. Hobbs, No. 97-4393 (4th Cir.) (136 F.3d 384) (February 18, 1998) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)
- U.S. v. Buchanan, No. CRIM. 95-10188-NG (D.Mass.) (987 F.Supp. 56) (December 18, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Avellino, No. 97-1117, No. 309 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 249) (January 30, 1998) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Marroquin, No. 97-1653 (1st Cir.) (136 F.3d 220) (February 17, 1998) (Judge Levin H. Campbell)
- Thomas v. Superintendent/Woodbourne Corr. Facility, No. 97-3578 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 227) (November 21, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Von Foelkel, No. 97-1167 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 339) (March 12, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ortiz, No. 96-3123 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 161) (February 24, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Franco, No. 95-50615 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 622) (February 11, 1998) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. CR 93-368 (E.D.N.Y.) (987 F.Supp. 143) (August 28, 1996) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
- U.S. v. Buchanan, No. 95CR-10188-NG (D.Mass.) (964 F.Supp. 533) (March 31, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
More from these topics:
- Second Circuit Holds Full De Novo Resentencing Hearing Required Based on Partially Successful Habeas Petition Where Resentencing Judge Not Original Judge and Changed Circumstances Plausibly Alleged, Dec. 1, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Indiana Supreme Court Says “Summary Judgment Is Not Summary Trial,” Remanding State Prisoner’s Malpractice Claim to a Jury, Aug. 15, 2024. Malpractice (Attorneys), Summary Judgment, Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Louisiana Supreme Court Finds Prosecution Withheld Favorable Impeachment and Exculpatory Evidence in Violation of Brady, Aug. 1, 2024. Exculpatory No Doctrine, Resentencing, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit: Government’s Inflammatory Arguments in Sentencing Memorandum and at Sentencing Hearing Implicitly Breached Plea Agreement Promise Not to Recommend Sentence in Excess of Low-End Guidelines Range, June 15, 2023. War on Drugs, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings, Validity of.
- Eleventh Circuit: District Court ‘Mischaracterizing’ Habeas Claim Left Claim Unresolved in Violation of Clisby, Requiring Remand, Jan. 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.