Skip navigation

U.S. v. DeLuca, No. 96-1173 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 24) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)

Here the Court held that the district court had not abused its discretion by enpaneling an anonymous jury, although it noted that the use of such procedures "is an extraordinary protective device" that should be used sparingly.

The Court wrote: "Although the empanelment of an anonymous jury should be recognized ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login