U.S. v. Rivas-Lopez, No. 2:97-CR-104 (D.Utah) (988 F.Supp. 1424) (December 31, 1997) (Judge J. Thomas Greene)
Loaded on April 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
April 20, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Miranda.
Here the Court held that the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3051 (entitled Admissibility of Confessions), rather than the standards laid down in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1996), govern the admissibility of confessions in Federal courts.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Small v. U.S., No. 97-5008 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 1334) (February 20, 1998) (Judge Patricia M. Wald)
- Gulliford v. Pierce County, No. 96-35614 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1345) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- Small v. U.S., No. 97-5008 (D.C. Cir.) (136 F.3d 1334) (February 20, 1998) (Judge Patricia M. Wald)
- U.S. v. Raynor, No. CR 97-0186 PLF (D.D.C.) (989 F.Supp. 43) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Paul L. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Espy, No. 97-0335 (D.D.C.) (989 F.Supp. 17) (December 23, 1997) (Judge Ricardo M. Urbina)
- U.S. v. Rivas-Lopez, No. 2:97-CR-104 (D.Utah) (988 F.Supp. 1424) (December 31, 1997) (Judge J. Thomas Greene)
- U.S. v. DeLuca, No. 96-1173 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 24) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. McDougal, No. 96-3270 (8th Cir.) (137 F.3d 547) (February 23, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Kraus, No. 96-2645 (7th Cir.) (137 F.3d 447) (February 9, 1998) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Kraus, No. 96-2645 (7th Cir.) (137 F.3d 447) (February 9, 1998) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. DeLuca, No. 96-1173 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 24) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. DeLuca, No. 96-1173 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 24) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- Gulliford v. Pierce County, No. 96-35614 (9th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1345) (February 27, 1998) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Woodlee, No. 97-7032 (10th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1399) (February 23, 1998) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Avery, No. 95-5232 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 343) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Rudolph, No. 96-5716 (3rd Cir.) (137 F.3d 173) (February 23, 1998) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Neder, No. 92-2929 (11th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1459) (March 19, 1998) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- U.S. v. Rudolph, No. 96-5716 (3rd Cir.) (137 F.3d 173) (February 23, 1998) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 94-4021 (11th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1434) (March 17, 1998) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant’s Conversation With Officers Not Consensual Based on Officers’ Positioning and Manner of Approaching Legally Parked Vehicle so Evidence Obtained Resulting From Conversation Must Be Suppressed, Aug. 15, 2024. Vehicle Searches, Consensual Encounters, Suppression, Miranda.
- Eleventh Circuit Reverses District Court’s Grant of Habeas Relief, Notes It’s ‘Murky on When Putting Two Suspects in a Room Together Qualifies as Interrogation Under Miranda’, July 15, 2024. AEDPA, Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Minors, Use of, Interrogation.
- Oregon Supreme Court Rules Police Questioning of Probationer in Probation Officer’s Secure Office Absent Miranda Warning Constitute ‘Compelling Circumstances’ and Suppresses Statements, June 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Interrogation, In Custody.
- First Circuit: Miranda Waiver Not Valid Where Interrogating Officer Answered ‘No’ to Defendant’s Question — ‘None of this can be used against me, can it?’, March 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, In-home, Right To Remain Silent, Interrogation, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- The Diminishment of Miranda Is Leading to False Confessions and Conviction of Innocents, Feb. 15, 2024. Commentary/Reviews, Wrongful Conviction, Confessions - Admissibility, Impeachment Evidence/Purposes, Miranda, Interrogation, In Custody, Confessions and Statements of Defendant, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- SCOTUS: § 1983 Claim Cannot Be Based on Violation of Miranda Because Not Tantamount to Violation of Fifth Amendment, Sept. 15, 2022. Fifth Amendment, Miranda.
- New Jersey Supreme Court: Defendant Did Not Voluntarily Waive Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Because Police Persistently Contradicted and Undermined Significance of Miranda During Interrogation, Aug. 15, 2022. Police Misconduct, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Miranda.
- Oregon Court Rules Prisoner’s Admissions in Disciplinary Hearing Violate Miranda, But Harmlessly, Aug. 1, 2022. Self Incrimination, Miranda.
- Vermont Supreme Court: Under Totality of Circumstances, Police Interview of Defendant in Store Parking Lot Was ‘Custodial Interrogation,’ Triggering Requirement for Miranda Warnings, May 1, 2022. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.
- California Court of Appeal: Police Created Atmosphere of Custodial Interrogation Requiring Miranda Warnings Even Though Prearrest Interview Occurred in Teen Suspect’s Home, Dec. 15, 2021. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.