Skip navigation

McCarthy v. Doe, No. 96-2767 (2nd Cir.) (146 F.3d 118) (June 9, 1998) (Judge J. Garvin Murtha)

After noting that the law governing prisoners subject to multiple sentences is "hardly a model of clarity", the Court flatly rejected, as incorrect, the BOP's interpretation of § 3584(a) - namely that it was powerless to grant the defendant nunc pro tunc relief by designating the state correctional facility as ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login