U.S. v. Bautista, No. 97-2222 (10th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1140) (May 22, 1998) (Judge James E. Barrett)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
August 10, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Miranda.
Case held that the giving of a Miranda warning does not, in and of itself, convert an otherwise non-custodial interview into a custodial interrogation (Id., at 1148-49).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Knowles, No. 98-CR-10 (E.D.Wisc.) (2 F.Supp.2d 1135) (April 15, 1998) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Santiago, No. S5 97 CR 786(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (3 F.Supp.2d 392) (February 13, 1998) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 97-1344 (8th Cir.) (145 F.3d 959) (May 27, 1998) (Judge John B. Jones)
- U.S. v. Bautista, No. 97-2222 (10th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1140) (May 22, 1998) (Judge James E. Barrett)
- U.S. v. Sprei, No. 97-1206 (2nd Cir.) (145 F.3d 528) (May 28, 1998) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Orena, No. 97-1174 (2nd Cir.) (145 F.3d 551) (June 3, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Leon, No. 97-568 (D.N.J.) (2 F.Supp.2d 592) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- U.S. v. Grewal, No. 96-751 (D.N.J.) (2 F.Supp.2d 612) (April 14, 1998) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- U.S. v. Byram, No. 97-2273 (1st Cir.) (145 F.3d 405) (May 20, 1998) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- Doe v. Pataki, No. 96 CIV. 1657(DC) (S.D.N.Y.) (3 F.Supp.2d 456) (May 7, 1998) (Judge Denny Chin)
- Walters v. Reno, No. 96-36304 (9th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1032) (May 18, 1998) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Walters v. Reno, No. 96-36304 (9th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1032) (May 18, 1998) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation, No. Civ. A. 98-10048 (D.Mass.) (3 F.Supp.2d 82) (February 18, 1998) (Judge William G. Young)
- Application for Interception of Wire Comm., No. 98-10074-WGY (D.Mass.) (2 F.Supp.2d 177) (April 30, 1998) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Orena, No. 97-1174 (2nd Cir.) (145 F.3d 551) (June 3, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- Vasquez v. Coughlin, No. 6:95-CV-104 (N.D.N.Y.) (2 F.Supp.2d 255) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Thomas J. McAvoy)
- U.S. v. Yashar, No. 98 CR 10 (N.D.Ill.) (2 F.Supp.2d 1009) (March 30, 1998) (Judge Milton I. Shadur)
- U.S. v. Owens, No. 97-3308 (7th Cir.) (145 F.3d 923) (May 26, 1998) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Schnitzer, No. 96-20908 (5th Cir.) (145 F.3d 721) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- U.S. v. Drew, No. 4:97cv146 (E.D.Va.) (2 F.Supp.2d 781) (March 20, 1998) (Judge Rebecca Beach Smith)
- U.S. v. Rowland, No. 96-1512 (10th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1194) (June 2, 1998) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Crouse, No. 97-1765 (6th Cir.) (145 F.3d 786) (May 27, 1998) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- U.S. v. Crouse, No. 97-1765 (6th Cir.) (145 F.3d 786) (May 27, 1998) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- Vasquez v. Coughlin, No. 6:95-CV-104 (N.D.N.Y.) (2 F.Supp.2d 255) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Thomas J. McAvoy)
- U.S. v. Brooks, No. 98-1111 (1st Cir.) (145 F.3d 446) (June 5, 1998) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Flennory, No. 96-5468 (11th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1264) (July 8, 1998) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 97-1344 (8th Cir.) (145 F.3d 959) (May 27, 1998) (Judge John B. Jones)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 97-1927 (1st Cir.) (145 F.3d 458) (June 10, 1998) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Pitts, No. Crim. A. 97-44-3 (E.D.Pa.) (3 F.Supp.2d 637) (June 1, 1998) (Judge Anita B. Brody)
- Denike v. Fauver, No. Civ. No. 83-2737(DRD) (D.N.J.) (3 F.Supp.2d 540) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise)
- U.S. v. Bornfield, No. 97-2169 (10th Cir.) (145 F.3d 1123) (May 13, 1998) (Judge James E. Barrett)
- U.S. v. Knowles, No. 98-CR-10 (E.D.Wisc.) (2 F.Supp.2d 1135) (April 15, 1998) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Porter, No. 97-1751 (7th Cir.) (145 F.3d 897) (May 14, 1998) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant’s Conversation With Officers Not Consensual Based on Officers’ Positioning and Manner of Approaching Legally Parked Vehicle so Evidence Obtained Resulting From Conversation Must Be Suppressed, Aug. 15, 2024. Vehicle Searches, Consensual Encounters, Suppression, Miranda.
- Eleventh Circuit Reverses District Court’s Grant of Habeas Relief, Notes It’s ‘Murky on When Putting Two Suspects in a Room Together Qualifies as Interrogation Under Miranda’, July 15, 2024. AEDPA, Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Minors, Use of, Interrogation.
- Oregon Supreme Court Rules Police Questioning of Probationer in Probation Officer’s Secure Office Absent Miranda Warning Constitute ‘Compelling Circumstances’ and Suppresses Statements, June 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Interrogation, In Custody.
- First Circuit: Miranda Waiver Not Valid Where Interrogating Officer Answered ‘No’ to Defendant’s Question — ‘None of this can be used against me, can it?’, March 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, In-home, Right To Remain Silent, Interrogation, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- The Diminishment of Miranda Is Leading to False Confessions and Conviction of Innocents, Feb. 15, 2024. Commentary/Reviews, Wrongful Conviction, Confessions - Admissibility, Impeachment Evidence/Purposes, Miranda, Interrogation, In Custody, Confessions and Statements of Defendant, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- SCOTUS: § 1983 Claim Cannot Be Based on Violation of Miranda Because Not Tantamount to Violation of Fifth Amendment, Sept. 15, 2022. Fifth Amendment, Miranda.
- New Jersey Supreme Court: Defendant Did Not Voluntarily Waive Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Because Police Persistently Contradicted and Undermined Significance of Miranda During Interrogation, Aug. 15, 2022. Police Misconduct, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Miranda.
- Oregon Court Rules Prisoner’s Admissions in Disciplinary Hearing Violate Miranda, But Harmlessly, Aug. 1, 2022. Self Incrimination, Miranda.
- Vermont Supreme Court: Under Totality of Circumstances, Police Interview of Defendant in Store Parking Lot Was ‘Custodial Interrogation,’ Triggering Requirement for Miranda Warnings, May 1, 2022. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.
- California Court of Appeal: Police Created Atmosphere of Custodial Interrogation Requiring Miranda Warnings Even Though Prearrest Interview Occurred in Teen Suspect’s Home, Dec. 15, 2021. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.