Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bendek, No. 96-9408 (11th Cir.) (146 F.3d 1326) (July 23, 1998) (Per Curiam)

Case held that even assuming permitting alternate juror to deliberate with regular jurors constituted plain error which affected the defendant's substantial rights, it did not warrant reversal since defendant failed to show prejudice from jury size.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login