Skip navigation

U.S. v. Brace, No. 96-50352 (5th Cir.) (145 F.3d 247) (June 24, 1998) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)

Here the Court held than an entrapment defense is "a challenge to criminal intent and thus to culpability" and that a defendant who proceeds to trial asserting that defense is not entitled to a sentence adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login