Skip navigation

U.S. v. Dubose, No. 96-30369 (9th Cir.) (146 F.3d 1141) (June 26, 1998) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)

Case is noted for its description of the sweeping nature of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act; as well as for its rejection of numerous constitutional challenges to the validity of that statute.

This case contains one of the most detailed explanations of the sweeping scope of the Mandatory Victims Restitution ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login