Skip navigation

U.S. v. Jarman, No. 97-1677 (6th Cir.) (144 F.3d 912) (May 11, 1998) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

Case rejected claim that information disclosed to Probation Officer after he signed proffer agreement should have been excluded under § 1B1.8, holding it was "completely extraneous to information concerning the unlawful activities of other persons.".

Here the court did agree that § 1B1.8(a) "unquestionably forbids the government to influence the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login