Skip navigation

U.S. v. Mathurin, No. 97-1041(L) (2nd Cir.) (148 F.3d 68) (June 3, 1998) (Per Curiam)

The sole issue presented in this case was whether a defendant's sworn affidavit stating that he was not given any Miranda warnings and that he never waived his right to counsel was sufficiently factual and specific to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on his motion to suppress some post-arrest ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login