Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rapal, No. 97-10287 (9th Cir.) (146 F.3d 661) (June 1, 1998) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)

This is a rare case in which the court held that a second sentence imposed after a prior remand was vindictive, and affirmed that vindictiveness can play no part in resentencing after a new trial.

Here the defendant was first sentenced to six months in custody with one month to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login