Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rhodes, No. 97-3131 (D.C. Cir.) (145 F.3d 1375) (June 19, 1998) (Judge David S. Tatel)

Clarifying its earlier decision in U.S. v. Whren, the D.C.Circuit held that on a remand the defendant could raise new issues which were based on facts that were not even existing at the time of the initial sentencing.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login