U.S. v. Mata, No. 97-1217, No. 743 (2nd Cir.) (133 F.3d 200) (January 7, 1998) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
February 23, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
In this case, the defendant had been sentenced to two consecutive terms, one for a drug trafficking conviction and one for a §924(c) conviction. After the defendant successfully challenged his §924(c) conviction under Bailey, the district court resentenced him and added a 2-level enhancement to his
underlying drug conviction. The ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Garces, No. 97-3073 (D.C. Cir.) (133 F.3d 70) (January 20, 1998) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Drinkwine, No. 97-1194, No. 711 (2nd Cir.) (133 F.3d 203) (January 8, 1998) (Judge Ellsworth A. Van Graafeiland)
- U.S. v. Gilliard, No. 96-9459 (11th Cir.) (133 F.3d 809) (January 21, 1998) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- U.S. v. Lipman, No. 97-50006 (9th Cir.) (133 F.3d 726) (January 8, 1998) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Morken, No. 97-1816MN (8th Cir.) (133 F.3d 628) (January 8, 1998) (Judge George G. Fagg)
- U.S. v. Damm, No. 97-1543 (8th Cir.) (133 F.3d 636) (January 8, 1998) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- Zehner v. Trigg, No. 97-1251 (7th Cir.) (133 F.3d 459) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 96-4498 (4th Cir.) (133 F.3d 251) (December 23, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- Westcott v. Crinklaw, No. 96-3700 (8th Cir.) (133 F.3d 658) (January 9, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Fiorelli, No. 94-2210 (3rd Cir.) (133 F.3d 218) (January 6, 1998) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Ramunno, No. 97-2132 (7th Cir.) (133 F.3d 476) (January 7, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Kaplan, No. 95-4908 (11th Cir.) (133 F.3d 826) (January 22, 1998) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 96-1245 (10th Cir.) (133 F.3d 737) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- Petta v. Rivera, No. 95-40157 (5th Cir.) (133 F.3d 330) (January 16, 1998) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 96-1245 (10th Cir.) (133 F.3d 737) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- Hill v. Butterworth, No. 97-2192 (11th Cir.) (133 F.3d 783) (December 15, 1997) (Judge Joseph Woodrow Hatchett)
- Zehner v. Trigg, No. 97-1251 (7th Cir.) (133 F.3d 459) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)
- U.S. v. Kaplan, No. 95-4908 (11th Cir.) (133 F.3d 826) (January 22, 1998) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
- U.S. v. Jarrett, No. 96-2615 (7th Cir.) (133 F.3d 519) (January 8, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Foster, No. 89-10405 (9th Cir.) (133 F.3d 704) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Wolny, No. 96-4169 (10th Cir.) (133 F.3d 758) (January 6, 1998) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 96-4498 (4th Cir.) (133 F.3d 251) (December 23, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- Bush v. Pitzer, No. 97-3024 (7th Cir.) (133 F.3d 455) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Garrison, No. 95-9361 (11th Cir.) (133 F.3d 831) (January 22, 1998) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
- U.S. v. Garrison, No. 95-9361 (11th Cir.) (133 F.3d 831) (January 22, 1998) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
- U.S. v. Mata, No. 97-1217, No. 743 (2nd Cir.) (133 F.3d 200) (January 7, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 96-1245 (10th Cir.) (133 F.3d 737) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Kennedy, No. 97-3009 (D.C. Cir.) (133 F.3d 53) (January 16, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Foster, No. 89-10405 (9th Cir.) (133 F.3d 704) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- Petta v. Rivera, No. 95-40157 (5th Cir.) (133 F.3d 330) (January 16, 1998) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
More from these topics:
- Second Circuit Holds Full De Novo Resentencing Hearing Required Based on Partially Successful Habeas Petition Where Resentencing Judge Not Original Judge and Changed Circumstances Plausibly Alleged, Dec. 1, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Indiana Supreme Court Says “Summary Judgment Is Not Summary Trial,” Remanding State Prisoner’s Malpractice Claim to a Jury, Aug. 15, 2024. Malpractice (Attorneys), Summary Judgment, Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Louisiana Supreme Court Finds Prosecution Withheld Favorable Impeachment and Exculpatory Evidence in Violation of Brady, Aug. 1, 2024. Exculpatory No Doctrine, Resentencing, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit: Government’s Inflammatory Arguments in Sentencing Memorandum and at Sentencing Hearing Implicitly Breached Plea Agreement Promise Not to Recommend Sentence in Excess of Low-End Guidelines Range, June 15, 2023. War on Drugs, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings, Validity of.
- Eleventh Circuit: District Court ‘Mischaracterizing’ Habeas Claim Left Claim Unresolved in Violation of Clisby, Requiring Remand, Jan. 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.