U.S. v. Queen, No. 96-4085 (4th Cir.) (132 F.3d 991) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
February 16, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
Here the Court held that evidence that the defendant had, some 10 years previously, engaged in two acts of witness tampering was admissible to show the defendant's intent in the instant case.
United States v. Queen, 132 F.3d 991 (4th Cir. 1997) (Judge Niemeyer)
United States v. Johnson, 132 F.3d ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Fernandez-Ventura, No. 97-1254 (1st Cir.) (132 F.3d 844) (January 6, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Fernandez-Ventura, No. 97-1254 (1st Cir.) (132 F.3d 844) (January 6, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 96-10575 (9th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1279) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Pierce, No. 97-1474 (8th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1207) (December 24, 1997) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Agostino, No. 97-2105 (7th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1183) (December 22, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Queen, No. 96-4085 (4th Cir.) (132 F.3d 991) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- Bloom v. Calderon, No. 95-99005 (9th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1267) (December 24, 1997) (Judge David R. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Agostino, No. 97-2105 (7th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1183) (December 22, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Queen, No. 96-4085 (4th Cir.) (132 F.3d 991) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Bolden, No. 96-3274 (10th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1353) (December 30, 1997) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 96-10575 (9th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1279) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Queen, No. 96-4085 (4th Cir.) (132 F.3d 991) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 96-10575 (9th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1279) (December 29, 1997) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Fernandez-Ventura, No. 97-1254 (1st Cir.) (132 F.3d 844) (January 6, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Woods v. Gamel, No. 96-7171 (11th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1417) (January 14, 1998) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- Lucas v. Johnson, No. 96-10389 (5th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1069) (January 9, 1998) (Judge E. Grady Jolly)
- U.S. v. Agostino, No. 97-2105 (7th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1183) (December 22, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Pierce, No. 97-1474 (8th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1207) (December 24, 1997) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Pierce, No. 97-1474 (8th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1207) (December 24, 1997) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Agostino, No. 97-2105 (7th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1183) (December 22, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Leandre, No. 96-3166 (D.C. Cir.) (132 F.3d 796) (January 13, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Dulany v. Carnahan, No. 96-2427 (8th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1234) (December 31, 1997) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Flowers, No. 96-CR-1064 (02)(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (983 F.Supp. 159) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Bolden, No. 96-3274 (10th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1353) (December 30, 1997) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Bolden, No. 96-3274 (10th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1353) (December 30, 1997) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Flowers, No. 96-CR-1064 (02)(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (983 F.Supp. 159) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court Announces Self-Defense Jury Instruction Does Not Require Intent to Harm or Kill Assailant, Oct. 1, 2024. Defenses, Jury Instructions, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Tenth Circuit Announces District Court Erred in Applying Attempted Murder Cross-Reference Under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.1 Based on Malice Aforethought, Without Finding Intent to Kill, Nov. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Unreasonable Application of Clearly Established Federal Law, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- New York Court of Appeals Reverses Murder Conviction Where Trial Court’s Evidentiary Rulings Deprived Defendant of ‘Opportunity to Present Complete Defense’, Dec. 15, 2022. Evidentiary Ruling, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner Alleging Sexual Assault by Guard Need Not Also Prove Excessive Force and Malicious Intent, June 1, 2022. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Guard Brutality/Beatings, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Mens Rea: Criminal Liability Should Equal Criminal Intent, Feb. 15, 2021. Mens Rea Element, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.