Skip navigation

U.S. v. Skeddle, No. 3:95CR736 (N.D.Ohio) (981 F.Supp. 1074) (October 21, 1997) (Judge James G. Carr)

In this case, the Government sought to introduce certain allegedly altered documents as evidence of intent to defraud and consciousness of guilt on the part of the defendant. The Court held that because there had been no initial showing that the documents were created as part of or in furtherance ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login