Skip navigation

U.S. v. Smith, No. 96-1245 (10th Cir.) (133 F.3d 737) (December 31, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)

Here the court addressed the overlapping scope of, and the difference bwteen, the vulnerable victims enhancement set forth in U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(2)(B) and the language in the Senior Citizens Against Marketing Scams Act - and it ultimately concluded that the district court had erred by attempting to distinguish the multiple ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login