Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
January 26, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Miranda.
The district court held, and the Court of Appeals ageed, that the striking of of six out of seven black venirepersons constituted a prima facie case of discrimination; but that case was offset by the prosecutor's race-neutral explanations for his actions." (Id., at 424).
This case is noted for Judge ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Courtois, No. 96-5105 (10th Cir.) (131 F.3d 937) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
- U.S. v. Chen, No. 95-5036 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 375) (October 31, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hebert, No. 96-41240 (5th Cir.) (131 F.3d 514) (December 15, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- Fraternal Order of Police v. U.S., No. 97-0145 (JR) (D.D.C.) (981 F.Supp. 1) (October 2, 1997) (Judge James Robertson)
- U.S. v. Hebert, No. 96-41240 (5th Cir.) (131 F.3d 514) (December 15, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Moore, No. 96-5852 (6th Cir.) (131 F.3d 595) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Hunter, No. Cr. No. 97-37-N (M.D.Ala.) (980 F.Supp. 1439) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Knobloch, No. 96-3022 (3rd Cir.) (131 F.3d 366) (December 10, 1997) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Dierling, No. 97-1021 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 722) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Hunter, No. Cr. No. 97-37-N (M.D.Ala.) (980 F.Supp. 1439) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- Museitef v. U.S., No. 96-3195 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 714) (November 10, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Dierling, No. 97-1021 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 722) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Neal v. Shimoda, No. 95-16564 (9th Cir.) (131 F.3d 818) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)
- U.S. v. Dierling, No. 97-1021 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 722) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- Mackall v. Angelone, No. 95-4018 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 442) (December 18, 1997) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- Britton v. Maloney, No. Civ. No. 93-11430-NG (D.Mass.) (981 F.Supp. 25) (September 26, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- Britton v. Maloney, No. Civ. No. 93-11430-NG (D.Mass.) (981 F.Supp. 25) (September 26, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Hunter, No. Cr. No. 97-37-N (M.D.Ala.) (980 F.Supp. 1439) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Saacks, No. 97-30246 (5th Cir.) (131 F.3d 540) (December 16, 1997) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Wiener)
- U.S. v. Ross, No. 96-3556 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 970) (December 19, 1997) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- Gabbert v. Conn, No. 95-56610 (9th Cir.) (131 F.3d 793) (December 8, 1997) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ward, No. 96-5789 (3rd Cir.) (131 F.3d 335) (November 13, 1997) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Rivera, No. 96-2188 (1st Cir.) (131 F.3d 222) (December 2, 1997) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Moore, No. 96-5852 (6th Cir.) (131 F.3d 595) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Maxwell, No. 97-1557 (7th Cir.) (131 F.3d 622) (December 4, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant’s Conversation With Officers Not Consensual Based on Officers’ Positioning and Manner of Approaching Legally Parked Vehicle so Evidence Obtained Resulting From Conversation Must Be Suppressed, Aug. 15, 2024. Vehicle Searches, Consensual Encounters, Suppression, Miranda.
- Eleventh Circuit Reverses District Court’s Grant of Habeas Relief, Notes It’s ‘Murky on When Putting Two Suspects in a Room Together Qualifies as Interrogation Under Miranda’, July 15, 2024. AEDPA, Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Minors, Use of, Interrogation.
- Oregon Supreme Court Rules Police Questioning of Probationer in Probation Officer’s Secure Office Absent Miranda Warning Constitute ‘Compelling Circumstances’ and Suppresses Statements, June 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Interrogation, In Custody.
- First Circuit: Miranda Waiver Not Valid Where Interrogating Officer Answered ‘No’ to Defendant’s Question — ‘None of this can be used against me, can it?’, March 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, In-home, Right To Remain Silent, Interrogation, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- The Diminishment of Miranda Is Leading to False Confessions and Conviction of Innocents, Feb. 15, 2024. Commentary/Reviews, Wrongful Conviction, Confessions - Admissibility, Impeachment Evidence/Purposes, Miranda, Interrogation, In Custody, Confessions and Statements of Defendant, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- SCOTUS: § 1983 Claim Cannot Be Based on Violation of Miranda Because Not Tantamount to Violation of Fifth Amendment, Sept. 15, 2022. Fifth Amendment, Miranda.
- New Jersey Supreme Court: Defendant Did Not Voluntarily Waive Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Because Police Persistently Contradicted and Undermined Significance of Miranda During Interrogation, Aug. 15, 2022. Police Misconduct, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Miranda.
- Oregon Court Rules Prisoner’s Admissions in Disciplinary Hearing Violate Miranda, But Harmlessly, Aug. 1, 2022. Self Incrimination, Miranda.
- Vermont Supreme Court: Under Totality of Circumstances, Police Interview of Defendant in Store Parking Lot Was ‘Custodial Interrogation,’ Triggering Requirement for Miranda Warnings, May 1, 2022. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.
- California Court of Appeal: Police Created Atmosphere of Custodial Interrogation Requiring Miranda Warnings Even Though Prearrest Interview Occurred in Teen Suspect’s Home, Dec. 15, 2021. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.