Skip navigation

Mackall v. Angelone, No. 95-4018 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 442) (December 18, 1997) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)

In his dissent, Judge Butzner framed the issue in this case as follows: "Did Mackall have a right to the assistance of competent counsel to pursue the issue of allegedly incompetent counsel in his state habeas corpus proceeding? Sound precedent suggests an affirmative answer. . . . Although a prisoner ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login