Skip navigation

Neal v. Shimoda, No. 95-16564 (9th Cir.) (131 F.3d 818) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)

The plaintiff alleged sex offenders appealed the judgment of the District of Hawaii, which granted summary judgment to defendant prison administrators on plaintiffs' claims brought under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, alleging that Hawaii's Sex Offender Treatment Program violated the ex post facto clause, their due process rights and their privilege ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login