U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
January 26, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Right to be Present.
Citing cases, the Court held that Confrontation Clause does not require presence of defendant at hearing on Motion for New Trial.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Maxwell, No. 97-1557 (7th Cir.) (131 F.3d 622) (December 4, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)
- U.S. v. Moore, No. 96-5852 (6th Cir.) (131 F.3d 595) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Rivera, No. 96-2188 (1st Cir.) (131 F.3d 222) (December 2, 1997) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Ward, No. 96-5789 (3rd Cir.) (131 F.3d 335) (November 13, 1997) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Gabbert v. Conn, No. 95-56610 (9th Cir.) (131 F.3d 793) (December 8, 1997) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Ross, No. 96-3556 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 970) (December 19, 1997) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Saacks, No. 97-30246 (5th Cir.) (131 F.3d 540) (December 16, 1997) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Wiener)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Hunter, No. Cr. No. 97-37-N (M.D.Ala.) (980 F.Supp. 1439) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- Britton v. Maloney, No. Civ. No. 93-11430-NG (D.Mass.) (981 F.Supp. 25) (September 26, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- Britton v. Maloney, No. Civ. No. 93-11430-NG (D.Mass.) (981 F.Supp. 25) (September 26, 1997) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- Mackall v. Angelone, No. 95-4018 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 442) (December 18, 1997) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Dierling, No. 97-1021 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 722) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Neal v. Shimoda, No. 95-16564 (9th Cir.) (131 F.3d 818) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)
- U.S. v. Dierling, No. 97-1021 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 722) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Museitef v. U.S., No. 96-3195 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 714) (November 10, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Hunter, No. Cr. No. 97-37-N (M.D.Ala.) (980 F.Supp. 1439) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Dierling, No. 97-1021 (8th Cir.) (131 F.3d 722) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Knobloch, No. 96-3022 (3rd Cir.) (131 F.3d 366) (December 10, 1997) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Hunter, No. Cr. No. 97-37-N (M.D.Ala.) (980 F.Supp. 1439) (October 28, 1997) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Moore, No. 96-5852 (6th Cir.) (131 F.3d 595) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Hebert, No. 96-41240 (5th Cir.) (131 F.3d 514) (December 15, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Fraternal Order of Police v. U.S., No. 97-0145 (JR) (D.D.C.) (981 F.Supp. 1) (October 2, 1997) (Judge James Robertson)
- Howard v. Moore, No. 95-4017 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 399) (December 9, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Hebert, No. 96-41240 (5th Cir.) (131 F.3d 514) (December 15, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Chen, No. 95-5036 (4th Cir.) (131 F.3d 375) (October 31, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Courtois, No. 96-5105 (10th Cir.) (131 F.3d 937) (December 11, 1997) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Petitioner Has Constitutional Right to Be Present at Evidentiary Hearing Under Felony Murder Resentencing Law, May 15, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Right to be Present.
- California Court of Appeal: Petitioner Has Constitutional Right to Be Present at Hearing to Determine Facts Surrounding Felony Murder Charges for Possible Resentencing Under § 1172.6, March 15, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Right to be Present.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.