Skip navigation

U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Reflecting the dilemma created by the judicial rule that a defendant is not entitled to a reversal of his conviction based on improper comments by the prosecutor, the Court emphasized that such inaction "does not mean we condone [such] remarks".

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login