U.S. v. Minneman, No. 97-2624 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 274) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
Loaded on July 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
July 13, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentences - Authorized.
Here the Court held that the Victim and Witness Protection Act does not authorize restitution for Title 26 tax offenses (id., at 284).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Florence, No. 97-2194 (1st Cir.) (143 F.3d 11) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- Tucker v. Branker, No. 96-5177 (D.C. Cir.) (142 F.3d 1294) (May 12, 1998) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Grossi, No. 97-2723 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 348) (May 29, 1998) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Beerheide v. Zavaras, No. Civ. No. 95-B-2325 (D.Colo.) (997 F.Supp. 1405) (March 16, 1998) (Judge Lewis T. Babcock)
- Ramirez v. U.S., No. Civ. 97-2693(WHW) (D.N.J.) (998 F.Supp. 425) (March 16, 1998) (Judge William H. Walls)
- U.S. v. Grossi, No. 97-2723 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 348) (May 29, 1998) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Byrd v. Hasty, No. 97-2129 (11th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1395) (June 11, 1998) (Judge Richard Mills)
- U.S. v. Kang, No. 97-3423 (8th Cir.) (143 F.3d 379) (April 23, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- Morales v. U.S., No. 96-2872, No. 1044 (2nd Cir.) (143 F.3d 94) (May 4, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- Atkins v. New York City, No. 97-7899 (2nd Cir.) (143 F.3d 100) (May 5, 1998) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. CR 92-926-ER (C.D.Cal.) (997 F.Supp. 1281) (March 12, 1998) (Judge Edward Rafeedie)
- U.S. v. Faulks, No. 96-2056 (3rd Cir.) (143 F.3d 133) (April 29, 1998) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- In Re Sealed Case (Sentencing Guidelines' "Substantial Assistance"), No. 97-3112 (D.C. Cir.) (149 F.3d 1198) (July 24, 1998) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- U.S. v. Kang, No. 97-3423 (8th Cir.) (143 F.3d 379) (April 23, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Grimes, No. 96-2916 (11th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1342) (June 8, 1998) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- Scotto v. Almenas, No. 97-7673 (2nd Cir.) (143 F.3d 105) (May 5, 1998) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Faulks, No. 96-2056 (3rd Cir.) (143 F.3d 133) (April 29, 1998) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Minneman, No. 97-2624 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 274) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- Parretti v. U.S., No. 95-56586 (9th Cir.) (143 F.3d 508) (May 1, 1998) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Grimes, No. 96-2916 (11th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1342) (June 8, 1998) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- U.S. v. Cluck, No. 97-50444 (5th Cir.) (143 F.3d 174) (June 3, 1998) (Judge E. Grady Jolly)
- U.S. v. Minneman, No. 97-2624 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 274) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Kang, No. 97-3423 (8th Cir.) (143 F.3d 379) (April 23, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. CR 92-926-ER (C.D.Cal.) (997 F.Supp. 1281) (March 12, 1998) (Judge Edward Rafeedie)
- U.S. v. Berg, No. 97 Crim. 0866(LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (998 F.Supp. 395) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Greer, No. 2:95-CR-72 (D.Vt.) (998 F.Supp. 399) (February 9, 1998) (Judge William K. III Sessions)
More from these topics:
- Federal Sentencing Guidelines Undergo Substantial Amendments, Jan. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, First Step Act, Violence Against Women Act, Criminal History, Qualifying Offenses, Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Sexual Abuse/Harrassment/Exploitation, Sexual Exploitation of Minors, Federally Protected Rights, Sexual Conduct with Minors, Sentences - Authorized, Safety Valve, Acceptance of Responsibility, Preservation of Judicial Resources, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Sixth Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Prove Sentencing Enhancements Apply, Jan. 15, 2021. Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Sentences - Authorized.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.