U.S. v. Minneman, No. 97-2624 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 274) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
Loaded on July 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
July 13, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentences - Authorized.
Here the Court held that the Victim and Witness Protection Act does not authorize restitution for Title 26 tax offenses (id., at 284).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Greer, No. 2:95-CR-72 (D.Vt.) (998 F.Supp. 399) (February 9, 1998) (Judge William K. III Sessions)
- U.S. v. Berg, No. 97 Crim. 0866(LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (998 F.Supp. 395) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. CR 92-926-ER (C.D.Cal.) (997 F.Supp. 1281) (March 12, 1998) (Judge Edward Rafeedie)
- U.S. v. Kang, No. 97-3423 (8th Cir.) (143 F.3d 379) (April 23, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Minneman, No. 97-2624 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 274) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Cluck, No. 97-50444 (5th Cir.) (143 F.3d 174) (June 3, 1998) (Judge E. Grady Jolly)
- U.S. v. Grimes, No. 96-2916 (11th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1342) (June 8, 1998) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- Parretti v. U.S., No. 95-56586 (9th Cir.) (143 F.3d 508) (May 1, 1998) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Minneman, No. 97-2624 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 274) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Faulks, No. 96-2056 (3rd Cir.) (143 F.3d 133) (April 29, 1998) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- Scotto v. Almenas, No. 97-7673 (2nd Cir.) (143 F.3d 105) (May 5, 1998) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Grimes, No. 96-2916 (11th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1342) (June 8, 1998) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- U.S. v. Kang, No. 97-3423 (8th Cir.) (143 F.3d 379) (April 23, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- In Re Sealed Case (Sentencing Guidelines' "Substantial Assistance"), No. 97-3112 (D.C. Cir.) (149 F.3d 1198) (July 24, 1998) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- U.S. v. Faulks, No. 96-2056 (3rd Cir.) (143 F.3d 133) (April 29, 1998) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. CR 92-926-ER (C.D.Cal.) (997 F.Supp. 1281) (March 12, 1998) (Judge Edward Rafeedie)
- Atkins v. New York City, No. 97-7899 (2nd Cir.) (143 F.3d 100) (May 5, 1998) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- Morales v. U.S., No. 96-2872, No. 1044 (2nd Cir.) (143 F.3d 94) (May 4, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Kang, No. 97-3423 (8th Cir.) (143 F.3d 379) (April 23, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- Byrd v. Hasty, No. 97-2129 (11th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1395) (June 11, 1998) (Judge Richard Mills)
- U.S. v. Grossi, No. 97-2723 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 348) (May 29, 1998) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Ramirez v. U.S., No. Civ. 97-2693(WHW) (D.N.J.) (998 F.Supp. 425) (March 16, 1998) (Judge William H. Walls)
- Beerheide v. Zavaras, No. Civ. No. 95-B-2325 (D.Colo.) (997 F.Supp. 1405) (March 16, 1998) (Judge Lewis T. Babcock)
- U.S. v. Grossi, No. 97-2723 (7th Cir.) (143 F.3d 348) (May 29, 1998) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Tucker v. Branker, No. 96-5177 (D.C. Cir.) (142 F.3d 1294) (May 12, 1998) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Florence, No. 97-2194 (1st Cir.) (143 F.3d 11) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
More from these topics:
- Federal Sentencing Guidelines Undergo Substantial Amendments, Jan. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, First Step Act, Violence Against Women Act, Criminal History, Qualifying Offenses, Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Sexual Abuse/Harrassment/Exploitation, Sexual Exploitation of Minors, Federally Protected Rights, Sexual Conduct with Minors, Sentences - Authorized, Safety Valve, Acceptance of Responsibility, Preservation of Judicial Resources, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Sixth Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Prove Sentencing Enhancements Apply, Jan. 15, 2021. Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Sentences - Authorized.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.