Brown v. Toombs, No. 97-1333 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1102) (March 27, 1998) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on June 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
June 01, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exhaustion of Remedies.
Case held that district courts should enforce the PLRA's exhaustion requirements sua sponte.
Case noted mich of the philosophy behind the enactment of the PLRA when it commented: "Prior to the enactment of [this] statute, no significant incentives existed to deter the filing of state prison petitions raising insubstantial issues, ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Jester, No. 97-2597 (7th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1168) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- Cody v. Hillard, No. 97-2020 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1197) (March 27, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Green, No. 97-4711 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1002) (April 6, 1998) (Judge John D. Jr. Butzner)
- U.S. v. Bray, No. 96-2261 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1104) (April 6, 1998) (Judge James L. Ryan)
- U.S. v. Urban, No. 97-7107 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 229) (March 20, 1998) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 96-1670 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 163) (March 24, 1998) (Judge Thomas J. Meskill)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Snoddy, No. 97-3366 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1224) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Kimberlin v. Department of Justice, No. 96-5250 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 944) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Brown v. Toombs, No. 97-1333 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1102) (March 27, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Flores-Ochoa, No. 97-11393 (5th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1022) (April 24, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- Scott v. District of Columbia, No. 97-7064 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 940) (April 3, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. White, No. 96-4302 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 998) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 97-3028 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 924) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Jiang, No. 97-1245 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 124) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Seventh Circuit: Postconviction Relief Petition Still Pending in Illinois Court 20 Years After Filing Entitles Petitioner to Seek Federal Habeas Relief Without First Exhausting State Remedies, Aug. 1, 2023. Habeas Corpus, Exhaustion of Remedies, Grounds for Relief.
- Ninth Circuit: Grievance Policy May Excuse Oregon Prisoner’s Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, May 1, 2023. Administrative Exhaustion, Grievances, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Seventh Circuit: Indiana Prisoner Who Failed to Formalize Grievance Also Failed to Exhaust Remedies, Feb. 1, 2023. Grievances, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Ninth Circuit: New Suit Not Required After Curing Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, Nov. 30, 2022. Administrative Exhaustion, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Sixth Circuit: No Abuse of Discretion in U.S. District Courts Imposing Habeas Remedy Different Than That Required Under State Law, May 15, 2022. Habeas Corpus, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Ninth Circuit Finds California Prisoner’s Administrative Remedies Effectively Unavailable, Feb. 1, 2021. Administrative Exhaustion, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.