Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, No. 97-581 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 357; 118 S.Ct. 2014) (June 22, 1998) (Justice Thomas)
Loaded on June 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
June 08, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exclusionary Rule.
By a vote of 5 to 4, the Supreme Court had ruled that illegally seized evidence, which would be barred by the exclusionary rule announced in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) from use by the prosecution in a criminal trial, can be used in a parole revocation hearing. …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Peterson, No. 97-10128 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 819) (March 31, 1998) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Paredes-Batista, No. 97-1110 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 367) (March 18, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Bajakajian, No. 96-1487 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 321; 118 S.Ct. 2028) (June 22, 1998) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Gonyea, No. 96-2267 (6th Cir.) (140 F.3d 649) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- U.S. v. Delgado, No. 97 CR 708 (E.D.N.Y.) (994 F.Supp. 143) (February 19, 1998) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Warren, No. 97-3234 (8th Cir.) (140 F.3d 742) (March 26, 1998) (Judge John B. Jones)
- U.S. v. Askari, No. 95-1662 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 536) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
- U.S. v. Paredes-Batista, No. 97-1110 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 367) (March 18, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Mills, No. 97-5085 (6th Cir.) (140 F.3d 630) (March 31, 1998) (Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey)
- Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, No. 97-581 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 357; 118 S.Ct. 2014) (June 22, 1998) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Bajakajian, No. 96-1487 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 321; 118 S.Ct. 2028) (June 22, 1998) (Justice Thomas)
- Caron v. U.S., No. 97-6270 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 308; 118 S.Ct. 2007) (June 22, 1998) (Justice Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Marmolejos, No. 96-1735 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 488) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Askari, No. 95-1662 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 536) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
- U.S. v. Qualls, No. 95-50378 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 824) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Desimone, No. 96-1023 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 457) (April 13, 1998) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Sampson, No. 96-4431 (4th Cir.) (140 F.3d 585) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Peterson, No. 97-10128 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 819) (March 31, 1998) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Gottlieb, No. 96-3278 (10th Cir.) (140 F.3d 865) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Qualls, No. 95-50378 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 824) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Gottlieb, No. 96-3278 (10th Cir.) (140 F.3d 865) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Castillo, No. 96-2251 (10th Cir.) (140 F.3d 874) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Deanell R. Tacha)
More from these topics:
- Oregon Parole Hearing Exclusion Rule Invalidated, Sept. 15, 2023. Parole Board Misconduct, Murder/Felony Murder, Exclusionary Rule, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Good-Faith Exception to Exclusionary Rule Inapplicable to Warrant Based on Affidavit Stating Cellphones Found at Scene of Traffic Crash ‘May’ Contain Evidence, May 15, 2023. Traffic Stops, Good Faith Exception, Exclusionary Rule.
- California Supreme Court Announces Predicate Offenses for Gang Enhancement or Gang Participation Not Provable Using Expert Witness Testimony Without Personal Knowledge of Facts, Sept. 15, 2021. Opinions and Expert Testimony, Gang Membership, Exclusionary Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.