Skip navigation

Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, No. 97-581 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 357; 118 S.Ct. 2014) (June 22, 1998) (Justice Thomas)

By a vote of 5 to 4, the Supreme Court had ruled that illegally seized evidence, which would be barred by the exclusionary rule announced in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) from use by the prosecution in a criminal trial, can be used in a parole revocation hearing. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login