Skip navigation

U.S. v. Gonyea, No. 96-2267 (6th Cir.) (140 F.3d 649) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)

Case held that since bank robbery was a general intent crime the defense of diminished capacity was not available.

Case noted that, although the diminished capacity defense lacks a universally accepted definition, it is usually offered to negate the mens rea element. (Id., at 650, n. 2). The Court then …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login