Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)

Case examined, and purported to answer, the question of who has the burden of proof about a defendant's intent and ability to produce or deliver drugs when the defendant claims he lacked such intent and ability.

The Guidelines are now more than 10 years old; and in that brief time ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login