U.S. v. Jester, No. 97-2597 (7th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1168) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
Loaded on June 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
June 01, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Felon in Possession Statute.
Case held that exemption portion of statute, permitting some classes of felons to own guns, does not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Among its holdings in this case, the Court ruled that felons are not a protected class for purposes of the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Jester, No. 97-2597 (7th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1168) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- Cody v. Hillard, No. 97-2020 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1197) (March 27, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Green, No. 97-4711 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1002) (April 6, 1998) (Judge John D. Jr. Butzner)
- U.S. v. Bray, No. 96-2261 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1104) (April 6, 1998) (Judge James L. Ryan)
- U.S. v. Urban, No. 97-7107 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 229) (March 20, 1998) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 96-1670 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 163) (March 24, 1998) (Judge Thomas J. Meskill)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Snoddy, No. 97-3366 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1224) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Kimberlin v. Department of Justice, No. 96-5250 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 944) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Brown v. Toombs, No. 97-1333 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1102) (March 27, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Flores-Ochoa, No. 97-11393 (5th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1022) (April 24, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- Scott v. District of Columbia, No. 97-7064 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 940) (April 3, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. White, No. 96-4302 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 998) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 97-3028 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 924) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Jiang, No. 97-1245 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 124) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Where Defense Counsel Failed to Understand State Self-Defense Statute Provides Complete Defense to Felony Murder Based on Felon-in-Possession Charge, Oct. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Felon in Possession Statute, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Murder/Felony Murder.
- 10th Circuit Reverses Guidelines Enhancement Because Possession of Ammo Does Not Facilitate Possession of a Firearm, Nov. 1, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Felon in Possession Statute, Stipulations.
- BOP Hits Back Hard After Federal Prisoner in Arizona Brandishes Gun, June 15, 2023. Felon in Possession Statute, Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Criminal Record Alone Does Not Justify Patfrisk, Gun Discovered in Waistband Suppressed, Dec. 15, 2022. Felon in Possession Statute, Suppression of Evidence, Pat Down Searches.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Under State Felon in Possession of Firearm Statute, Possessing Multiple Firearms Simultaneously Constitutes One Offense, Not Multiple, Nov. 15, 2022. Felon in Possession Statute, In Connection With Another Felony Offense.
- SCOTUS: Rehaif Error Doesn’t Automatically Require Reversal of Conviction, Plain-Error Test Must Be Satisfied for Re-lief, Feb. 15, 2022. Felon in Possession Statute, Firearms, Plain/Harmless Error.
- Ninth Circuit: Rehaif Error Requires Automatic Dismissal of Indictment, Jan. 15, 2021. Felon in Possession Statute, Pro Se Issues, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Kansas Supreme Court Announces Residual Clause of Law Prohibiting Knife Possession by Felons Unconstitutionally Vague, Oct. 15, 2020. Felon in Possession Statute, Vagueness/Overbreadth.
- Tenth Circuit: District Court Plainly Erred in Giving Erroneous Constructive Possession of Firearm Instruction, Conviction Reversed, Sept. 15, 2020. Jury Instructions, Felon in Possession Statute.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.