Skip navigation

U.S. v. Peterson, No. 97-10128 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 819) (March 31, 1998) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)

This case deals with the so-called Bruton rule that was enunciated by the Supreme Court in Bruton v. U.S., 391 U.S. 123 (1968), which held that a defendant is deprived of his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation when a facially incriminating confession of a non-testifying co-defendant is introduced at their ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login