U.S. v. Taylor, No. 97-3028 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 924) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
Loaded on June 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
June 01, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
Case rejected claim that counsel's persistent demands for money created a conflict, but it ordered an evidentiary hearing on the claim that counsel had a conflict by failing to raise an incorrect and embarrassing "advice of counsel" defense.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Jester, No. 97-2597 (7th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1168) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- Cody v. Hillard, No. 97-2020 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1197) (March 27, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Green, No. 97-4711 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1002) (April 6, 1998) (Judge John D. Jr. Butzner)
- U.S. v. Bray, No. 96-2261 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1104) (April 6, 1998) (Judge James L. Ryan)
- U.S. v. Urban, No. 97-7107 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 229) (March 20, 1998) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 96-1670 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 163) (March 24, 1998) (Judge Thomas J. Meskill)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Snoddy, No. 97-3366 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1224) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Kimberlin v. Department of Justice, No. 96-5250 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 944) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Brown v. Toombs, No. 97-1333 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1102) (March 27, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Flores-Ochoa, No. 97-11393 (5th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1022) (April 24, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- Scott v. District of Columbia, No. 97-7064 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 940) (April 3, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. White, No. 96-4302 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 998) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 97-3028 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 924) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Jiang, No. 97-1245 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 124) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Defense Counsel Had Actual Conflict of Interest Where Own Performance During Police Interview of Defendant Could Serve as Basis of Motion to Suppress Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial Required W, March 15, 2025. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Motions To Suppress, Conflict of Interest.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.