U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on June 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
June 01, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
Case held that a plea of not guilty makes "intent" a material issue which permits introduction of evidence of past crimes to allow the Government to meet its "substantial" burden of proof.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Jiang, No. 97-1245 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 124) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 97-3028 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 924) (April 3, 1998) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. White, No. 96-4302 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 998) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- Scott v. District of Columbia, No. 97-7064 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 940) (April 3, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Hazut, No. 96-1683 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 187) (March 25, 1998) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Flores-Ochoa, No. 97-11393 (5th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1022) (April 24, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- Brown v. Toombs, No. 97-1333 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1102) (March 27, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Kimberlin v. Department of Justice, No. 96-5250 (D.C. Cir.) (139 F.3d 944) (April 7, 1998) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Snoddy, No. 97-3366 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1224) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Millard, No. 96-3749 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1200) (March 30, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 96-1670 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 163) (March 24, 1998) (Judge Thomas J. Meskill)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. 97-6270 (11th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1355) (April 28, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
- U.S. v. Urban, No. 97-7107 (3rd Cir.) (140 F.3d 229) (March 20, 1998) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Bray, No. 96-2261 (6th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1104) (April 6, 1998) (Judge James L. Ryan)
- U.S. v. Green, No. 97-4711 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1002) (April 6, 1998) (Judge John D. Jr. Butzner)
- Cody v. Hillard, No. 97-2020 (8th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1197) (March 27, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Melgar, No. 96-4582 (4th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1005) (April 8, 1998) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Jester, No. 97-2597 (7th Cir.) (139 F.3d 1168) (April 6, 1998) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Villegas, No. CR 96-1123 DWW (C.D.Cal.) (993 F.Supp. 766) (February 2, 1998) (Judge David W. Williams)
More from these topics:
- Kansas Supreme Court: Trial Court Erred by Admitting Evidence of Prior Crimes Without Proper Foundation Because State Failed to Prove Defendant Committed Those Crimes, Nov. 15, 2025. Lack of Evidence, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Character/Reputation/Propensity, Bad Acts Evidence.
- Third Circuit: Where Prosecutor “Flooded” Jury Trial With Evidence of Defendant’s Prior Bad Acts, Counsel Was Constitutionally Ineffective in Not Seeking Contemporaneous Limiting Instructions and Not Objecting When Evidence Went Beyond Limited Purpose –, Oct. 15, 2025. Jury Instructions, Strickland Standard, Failure to Preserve Challenge, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence, Bad Acts Evidence.
- Ohio Supreme Court Announces Self-Defense Jury Instruction Does Not Require Intent to Harm or Kill Assailant, Oct. 1, 2024. Defenses, Jury Instructions, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Tenth Circuit Announces District Court Erred in Applying Attempted Murder Cross-Reference Under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.1 Based on Malice Aforethought, Without Finding Intent to Kill, Nov. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Unreasonable Application of Clearly Established Federal Law, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- New York Court of Appeals Reverses Murder Conviction Where Trial Court’s Evidentiary Rulings Deprived Defendant of ‘Opportunity to Present Complete Defense’, Dec. 15, 2022. Evidentiary Ruling, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner Alleging Sexual Assault by Guard Need Not Also Prove Excessive Force and Malicious Intent, June 1, 2022. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Guard Brutality/Beatings, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Mens Rea: Criminal Liability Should Equal Criminal Intent, Feb. 15, 2021. Mens Rea Element, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.