Whelchel v. Wood, No. CS-95-500-RHW (E.D.Wash.) (996 F.Supp. 1019) (November 19, 1997) (Judge Robert H. Whaley)
Loaded on June 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
June 29, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Case held that violations of Confrontation Clause had a substantial and injurious influence on the jury and required vacation of the conviction.
Judge Shadur once observed that "Any efforts of the lower courts in the federal system to interpret the sometimes Delphic pronouncements from the Supreme Court can on occasion ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Johnson v. Crabtree, No. CIV. 97-37-HA (D.Or.) (996 F.Supp. 999) (December 1, 1997) (Judge Ancer L. Haggerty)
- U.S. v. Gotti, No. 98 CR. 42 (BDP) (S.D.N.Y.) (996 F.Supp. 321) (March 12, 1998) (Judge Barrington D. Jr. Parker)
- U.S. v. Hadrick, No. Crim. No. 96-12 (W.D.Pa.) (996 F.Supp. 464) (April 2, 1998) (Judge Sean J. McLaughlin)
- U.S. v. Sclafani, No. Crim. No. 97-405 (D.N.J.) (996 F.Supp. 400) (March 11, 1998) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. CR 93-368 JBW (E.D.N.Y.) (996 F.Supp. 194) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Acevedo, No. 95-4729 (11th Cir.) (141 F.3d 1421) (May 22, 1998) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Parsons, No. 97-1522 (1st Cir.) (141 F.3d 386) (April 16, 1998) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- Whelchel v. Wood, No. CS-95-500-RHW (E.D.Wash.) (996 F.Supp. 1019) (November 19, 1997) (Judge Robert H. Whaley)
- U.S. v. Manning, No. 96-1797 (6th Cir.) (142 F.3d 336) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
- U.S. v. Cottman, No. 96-5492 (3rd Cir.) (142 F.3d 160) (April 21, 1998) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
- U.S. v. Hill, No. 96-3843 (6th Cir.) (142 F.3d 305) (April 16, 1998) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
- U.S. v. Gotti, No. 98 CR. 42 (BDP) (S.D.N.Y.) (996 F.Supp. 321) (March 12, 1998) (Judge Barrington D. Jr. Parker)
- U.S. v. Singleton, No. 97-3178 (10th Cir.) (144 F.3d 1343) (July 1, 1998) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Isaac, No. 97-7139 (3rd Cir.) (141 F.3d 477) (April 10, 1998) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Ladum, No. 97-30018 (9th Cir.) (141 F.3d 1328) (April 17, 1998) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- Johnson v. Crabtree, No. CIV. 97-37-HA (D.Or.) (996 F.Supp. 999) (December 1, 1997) (Judge Ancer L. Haggerty)
- U.S. v. Singleton, No. 97-3178 (10th Cir.) (144 F.3d 1343) (July 10, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cottman, No. 96-5492 (3rd Cir.) (142 F.3d 160) (April 21, 1998) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.
- Maryland Court of Appeals Announces Standard for Whether Scientific Evidence Is ‘Testimonial’ for Confrontation Right Purposes Under Article 21 of Maryland Declaration of Rights, Nov. 15, 2021. junk science, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- The Clash Between Closed-Source Forensic Tools and the Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2021. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, Cell Site Location Information ("CSLI"), Breathalyzer Tests, EP2P Software, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Fifth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief Because Detective’s Testimony of Witness Identification of Defendant Violates Confrontation Clause, Oct. 15, 2020. Habeas Corpus, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.