Skip navigation

Hadix v. Johnson, No. 96-2463 (6th Cir.) (133 F.3d 940) (January 13, 1998) (Per Curiam)

This prison case is noted because it reversed a highly persuasive decision of Judge Feikens (reported
at Hadix v. Johnson, 947 F.Supp. 1100 (E.D.Mich. 1996) (Hadix I)) in which he held unconstitutional one
of the most controversial of the many provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), namely 18 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login