Skip navigation

U.S. v. Padilla, No. 97 CR 72 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (986 F.Supp. 163) (August 15, 1997) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)

In this case, Judge Scheindlin granted in part defense motions to suppress some of the evidence that was seized during a searh on the grounds that such evidence was not "immediately apparent." Noting that the agents in this case were authorized to search only for guns and drugs, the Judge ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login