Skip navigation

U.S. v. Saenz, No. 96-40546 (5th Cir.) (134 F.3d 697) (February 2, 1998) (Per Curiam)

United States v. Tilghman, 134 F.3d 414 (D.C.Cir. 1998) (Judge Tatel)
United States v. Saenz, 134 F.3d 697 (5th Cir. 1998) (Per Curiam)

It is easy to understand why it is often so difficult for defense counsel to object when a judge abandons his or her role of absolute neutrality ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login