Skip navigation

Scott v. Albury, No. 96-2943, No. 1049 (2nd Cir.) (138 F.3d 474) (March 9, 1998) (Per Curiam)

Case held that in condicting a Sandin analysis to determine whether a disciplinary sentence imposed an atypical and significant hardship, the court must consider the degree and duration of the sentence actually imposed - not the maximum sentence that could have been imposed. While the Court recognized that before the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login