Skip navigation

U.S. v. Anderson, No. 96-1653 (1st Cir.) (139 F.3d 291) (March 27, 1998) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)

Te Court held that "coercion" for purposes of ยง 2G1.2(b)(1) "must at a minimium involve, conceptually speaking, an impending threat of some negative consequence that will affirmatively befall a person if he or she does not succomb to the pressure that is being exerted." (Id., at 298). Thus, under that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login