Skip navigation

U.S. v. Anderson, No. 96-1653 (1st Cir.) (139 F.3d 291) (March 27, 1998) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)

Te Court held that "coercion" for purposes of § 2G1.2(b)(1) "must at a minimium involve, conceptually speaking, an impending threat of some negative consequence that will affirmatively befall a person if he or she does not succomb to the pressure that is being exerted." (Id., at 298). Thus, under that …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login