Skip navigation

U.S. v. Wainuskis, No. 96-60742 (5th Cir.) (138 F.3d 183) (April 9, 1998) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)

Case held that even though the Bailey case made it clear that the defendant had not "used" a gun, there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction under the "carry" prong of § 924(c) - but see Judge DeMoss's strong dissent.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login