U.S. v. Luciano, No. 97-1221, No. 131 (2nd Cir.) (158 F.3d 655) (October 15, 1998) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Nov. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
November 30, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
Last year the Second Circuit authoritatively pronounced: "We have never held that a failure to pay fees or an attorney's motion to withdraw for his clients failure to pay, without more, gives rise to a conflict of interest and decline to do so here." U.S. v. O'Neil, 118 F.3d 65, ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Knowles v. Iowa, No. 97-7597 (U.S. Supreme Court) (525 U.S. 113; 119 S.Ct. 484) (December 8, 1998) (Justice Rehnquist)
- U.S. v. Brandon, No. 97-3812 (6th Cir.) (158 F.3d 947) (October 23, 1998) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
- In Re City of Philadelphia Litigation, No. 96-1978 (3rd Cir.) (158 F.3d 723) (September 9, 1998) (Judge Carol Los Mansmann)
- White v. Fauver, No. Civ.A. No. 97-5127 (D.N.J.) (19 F.Supp.2d 305) (September 29, 1998) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- White v. Fauver, No. Civ.A. No. 97-5127 (D.N.J.) (19 F.Supp.2d 305) (September 29, 1998) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- U.S. v. Adkinson, No. 92-2872 (11th Cir.) (158 F.3d 1147) (October 26, 1998) (Judge James C. Hill)
- U.S. v. Luciano, No. 97-1221, No. 131 (2nd Cir.) (158 F.3d 655) (October 15, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Posada-Rios, No. 94-20654 (5th Cir.) (158 F.3d 832) (October 21, 1998) (Judge Simeon T. III Lake)
- U.S. v. Casey, No. 97-4222 (8th Cir.) (158 F.3d 993) (October 21, 1998) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Salzano, No. 97-3337 (10th Cir.) (158 F.3d 1107) (October 16, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Adkinson, No. 92-2872 (11th Cir.) (158 F.3d 1147) (October 26, 1998) (Judge James C. Hill)
- Garner v. Meoli, No. Civ.A. 96-1351 (E.D.Pa.) (19 F.Supp.2d 378) (August 31, 1998) (Judge Jan E. Dubois)
- U.S. v. Barnes, No. 96-1494, No. 223 (2nd Cir.) (158 F.3d 662) (October 21, 1998) (Judge Edward R. Korman)
- U.S. v. Casey, No. 97-4222 (8th Cir.) (158 F.3d 993) (October 21, 1998) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Defense Counsel Had Actual Conflict of Interest Where Own Performance During Police Interview of Defendant Could Serve as Basis of Motion to Suppress Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial Required W, March 15, 2025. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Motions To Suppress, Conflict of Interest.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.