Skip navigation

U.S. v. Paul, No. 97-1568 (2nd Cir.) (156 F.3d 403) (September 24, 1998) (Per Curiam)

Here the defendant objected to the use of 20 year old convictions in the determination of his status as an armed career criminal - an argument which the court promptly rejected, stating that there was no temporal limit in the statute and that the court lacked the authority to create ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login