Whitley v. Hunt, No. 97-40938 (5th Cir.) (158 F.3d 882) (October 23, 1998) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
Loaded on Nov. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
November 02, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exhaustion of Remedies.
Case held that Federal prisoners pressing monetary claims in a Bivens action against Federal officials need not exhaust unavailable administrative remedies - although it also confirmed that Federal prisoners must exhaust any available remedies.
Whitley v. Hunt, 158 F.3d 882 (5th Cir. 1998) (Judge DeMoss)
Lunsford v. Jumao, 155 F.3d …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Wilke, No. 98-1488 (7th Cir.) (156 F.3d 749) (September 16, 1998) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Hargrett, No. 97-1205 (2nd Cir.) (156 F.3d 447) (September 29, 1998) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- Amatel v. Reno, No. 97-5293 (D.C. Cir.) (156 F.3d 192) (September 15, 1998) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Connelly, No. 97-30233 (9th Cir.) (156 F.3d 978) (September 18, 1998) (Judge Edward C. Jr. Reed)
- Lee v. Reno, No. Cov.A. 97-2308(JHG) (D.D.C.) (15 F.Supp.2d 26) (July 27, 1998) (Judge Joyce Hens Green)
- Dolfi v. Pontesso, No. 98-1394 (6th Cir.) (156 F.3d 696) (September 30, 1998) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- Amatel v. Reno, No. 97-5293 (D.C. Cir.) (156 F.3d 192) (September 15, 1998) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Paradies, No. CR 193-310 (N.D.Ga.) (14 F.Supp.2d 1315) (February 20, 1998) (Judge Anthony J. Alaimo)
- Lunsford v. Jumao-As, No. 96-56503 (9th Cir.) (155 F.3d 1178) (October 5, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- Whitley v. Hunt, No. 97-40938 (5th Cir.) (158 F.3d 882) (October 23, 1998) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Silkman, No. 97-3888 (8th Cir.) (156 F.3d 833) (September 16, 1998) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Martinez, No. 97-50340 (9th Cir.) (156 F.3d 936) (September 14, 1998) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Orr v. Hawk, No. 96-6498 (6th Cir.) (156 F.3d 651) (September 9, 1998) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- U.S. v. Paradies, No. CR 193-310 (N.D.Ga.) (14 F.Supp.2d 1315) (February 20, 1998) (Judge Anthony J. Alaimo)
- U.S. v. Riddick, No. 97-1367 (3rd Cir.) (156 F.3d 505) (September 25, 1998) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- Luther v. Vanur, No. 5:97-HC-259-BR2 (E.D.N.C.) (14 F.Supp.2d 773) (December 3, 1997) (Judge W. Earl Britt)
- U.S. v. Paul, No. 97-1568 (2nd Cir.) (156 F.3d 403) (September 24, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Bulacan, No. 97-10222 (9th Cir.) (156 F.3d 963) (September 17, 1998) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Levy-Cordero, No. 93-1879 (1st Cir.) (156 F.3d 244) (September 17, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Gordon, No. 97-2397 (2nd Cir.) (156 F.3d 376) (September 22, 1998) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Seventh Circuit: Postconviction Relief Petition Still Pending in Illinois Court 20 Years After Filing Entitles Petitioner to Seek Federal Habeas Relief Without First Exhausting State Remedies, Aug. 1, 2023. Habeas Corpus, Exhaustion of Remedies, Grounds for Relief.
- Ninth Circuit: Grievance Policy May Excuse Oregon Prisoner’s Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, May 1, 2023. Administrative Exhaustion, Grievances, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Seventh Circuit: Indiana Prisoner Who Failed to Formalize Grievance Also Failed to Exhaust Remedies, Feb. 1, 2023. Grievances, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Ninth Circuit: New Suit Not Required After Curing Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, Nov. 30, 2022. Administrative Exhaustion, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Sixth Circuit: No Abuse of Discretion in U.S. District Courts Imposing Habeas Remedy Different Than That Required Under State Law, May 15, 2022. Habeas Corpus, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Ninth Circuit Finds California Prisoner’s Administrative Remedies Effectively Unavailable, Feb. 1, 2021. Administrative Exhaustion, Exhaustion of Remedies.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.